![]() What he does do, however, is throw in more than a few Nolan-like touches. ![]() But the thing is, all of this thievery (or homage-paying if you want to be nice) wouldn't be such an issue if "Hypnotic" managed to tell a good story. Unfortunately, the film is so muddled and disjointed that it becomes a chore to watch. It's not a confusing film - especially since Rodriguez uses the third act to blatantly spell everything out - but it's so narratively murky that you may find yourself wishing someone would hypnotize you into thinking you're watching a better movie. Going from work like that to ripping off Nolan and old "X-Files" episodes feels like a step backward for the director no matter how you look at it. And as he evolved, he was fond of experimenting, like when he teamed up with Quentin Tarantino to helm the double-feature "Grindhouse," or like when he brought the world of Frank Miller's "Sin City" to life. There was a time when the filmmaker was a young hotshot, considered innovative and crafty for his ability to stretch minuscule budgets into indie darlings. While it makes sense that anyone would want to rip off Nolan - he's one of our most popular filmmakers - it's somewhat disheartening to see Rodriguez embrace such unoriginality. ![]() ![]() It's a pretty good episode, and it's pretty clear that it must be a favorite of Robert Rodriguez because he rather shamelessly rips it off for his new movie "Hypnotic." Working with co-writer Max Borenstein, director Rodriguez creates a film that frequently feels like an extended "X-Files" episode, and when it's not doing that, it's rather liberally borrowing from the work of Christopher Nolan. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |